1 2013-07-17T02:41:44 <asingla> ThomasWaldmann: updated + replied to your comments https://codereview.appspot.com/10915044/
2 2013-07-17T03:51:07 <ananasova> moin
3 2013-07-17T03:54:33 <ananasova> ThomasWaldmann: so the rule holds for lists. i am it also to tuples
4 2013-07-17T03:54:57 <ananasova> i am assuming it should be used also for tuples
5 2013-07-17T03:57:12 <ananasova> ThomasWaldmann: about "incompatibility issues" - https://tldrlegal.uservoice.com/forums/179175-general/suggestions/3760887-licensense-compatibility
6 2013-07-17T03:58:31 * ananasova has upvoted
7 2013-07-17T05:09:06 * xiaq_ added a diary entry
8 2013-07-17T05:09:08 *** xiaq_
9 2013-07-17T06:53:00 <sharky93> moin
10 2013-07-17T06:53:07 <sharky93> some updates @ https://github.com/twitter/bootstrap/issues/2054
11 2013-07-17T06:55:20 <sharky93> and all they say is sooooon @twbootstrap
12 2013-07-17T07:02:25 <ananasova> "There's pretty much no chance the bootstrap license will ever change."
13 2013-07-17T07:03:32 <ananasova> ohh sorry, the issue is so looong... didn't see initially the issue reopened
14 2013-07-17T07:05:27 * sharky93 enjoys the rain :)
15 2013-07-17T07:09:02 *** vpv_
16 2013-07-17T07:14:09 *** vpv
17 2013-07-17T07:29:55 <rciorba> moin
18 2013-07-17T07:38:11 <rciorba> please look at the latest: https://codereview.appspot.com/11254043/ ok for a PR?
19 2013-07-17T07:42:27 <xiaq> ThomasWaldmann: separate +show view for tickets https://codereview.appspot.com/11430043/ also see my message there.
20 2013-07-17T07:42:30 <xiaq> eSyr: ^^
21 2013-07-17T07:42:33 <xiaq> eSyr-ng: ^^
22 2013-07-17T09:37:19 *** greg_
23 2013-07-17T09:52:39 <sharky93> TheSheep: so should we fix the indent all in one changeset?
24 2013-07-17T09:53:13 <sharky93> TheSheep: it might be better, if you could confirm the previous commits :)
25 2013-07-17T09:58:11 <TheSheep> sharky93: "confirm"?
26 2013-07-17T09:59:13 <sharky93> TheSheep: review i mean.
27 2013-07-17T10:29:23 <sharky93> TheSheep: what is the norm to be followed for bringing in the changes you suggested ? more commits ? if yes, what message should be used?
28 2013-07-17T10:51:52 <TheSheep> sharky93: I don't know
29 2013-07-17T10:56:44 <sharky93> TheSheep: well :D .. maybe we ask thomas
30 2013-07-17T11:00:19 <sharky93> ThomasWaldmann: ^^
31 2013-07-17T11:27:42 <sharky93> TheSheep: btw, rest of the commits are fine ?
32 2013-07-17T12:23:40 <TheSheep> sharky93: no, I'm still looking
33 2013-07-17T12:23:47 <TheSheep> sharky93: sorry, lots of work a work
34 2013-07-17T12:28:55 <ananasova> ThomasWaldmann, waldi: updated Subscribers cr, please review - https://codereview.appspot.com/10950045/
35 2013-07-17T12:30:13 <ThomasWaldmann> sharky93: your question is unclear
36 2013-07-17T12:47:07 *** dave_largo
37 2013-07-17T12:58:02 *** brunomartin
38 2013-07-17T13:11:56 <TheSheep> sharky93: reviewed the rest
39 2013-07-17T13:28:26 <ananasova> ThomasWaldmann: updated https://codereview.appspot.com/10950045/
40 2013-07-17T13:48:14 *** rob_____
41 2013-07-17T13:49:47 <rob_____> hello everyone, could someone tell me when moin2 will -approximately- be released? will it rather be in 4 months or in 1+ years? i'm considering to use it for a project which will take a few months anyway, however if moin2 will be released later than that, i'd rather use 1.9.7
42 2013-07-17T13:53:00 * ThomasWaldmann can't predict the future
43 2013-07-17T13:53:47 <ThomasWaldmann> the general rule is that if you need something for production, you should use 1.9.x
44 2013-07-17T13:54:39 <rob_____> couldn't you make an educated guess, though?
45 2013-07-17T13:55:16 <rob_____> I suppose your judgment on how long stuff on the to-do list will take is worth more than mine :)
46 2013-07-17T13:58:19 <ThomasWaldmann> it depend on contributions and i can't predict those.
47 2013-07-17T13:58:48 <rob_____> I see. thanks
48 2013-07-17T13:59:00 <ThomasWaldmann> but considering that soc will run for a while and we will be busy merging the stuff afterwards, don't expect it too soon.
49 2013-07-17T13:59:24 <rob_____> alright, thank you
50 2013-07-17T13:59:26 <rob_____> bye
51 2013-07-17T13:59:46 *** rob_____
52 2013-07-17T14:28:56 <xiaq> ThomasWaldmann: comments on this too, plz :) https://codereview.appspot.com/10889044/
53 2013-07-17T14:28:59 <xiaq> eSyr-ng: ^^
54 2013-07-17T14:40:54 <ThomasWaldmann> xiaq: the generalized index item type sounds interesting
55 2013-07-17T14:42:15 <ThomasWaldmann> and that you work on getting some stuff published on your public repo
56 2013-07-17T14:56:51 <xiaq> ThomasWaldmann: keeping patchsets in the mq makes for a very clean history :)
57 2013-07-17T15:00:27 <ThomasWaldmann> midterm evals will be based on committed and published stuff, not on whatever students have in codereview or mq
58 2013-07-17T15:02:23 * xiaq 'll try to publish more then
59 2013-07-17T15:07:08 <ThomasWaldmann> also keep in mind that mentors won't actually run your code as long as they can't get it easily (like when cloning your public repo)
60 2013-07-17T15:07:38 * ThomasWaldmann bbl
61 2013-07-17T15:25:07 <sharky93> ThomasWaldmann: for ex here @ https://bitbucket.org/sharky93/moin-2.0-bootstrap/commits/5d61b26cad7c7ed173053de53967f96ecb1f4372 is there a norm i should follow to include the changes suggested by TheSheep like referring to this commit in the new one or some standard message we use ?
62 2013-07-17T15:56:33 <ananasova> ThomasWaldmann: https://codereview.appspot.com/10950045/ made some fixes, last 3 patches
63 2013-07-17T16:24:46 <ThomasWaldmann> sharky93: i still have no idea what the problem is
64 2013-07-17T16:25:57 <ThomasWaldmann> TheSheep: i wanted something visible to indicate this error condition, thus not just ''
65 2013-07-17T16:30:18 <ThomasWaldmann> sharky93: something like "... for changeset XXXXXXXXX" (XXXXX being the hex id)?
66 2013-07-17T16:31:12 <sharky93> ThomasWaldmann: yeah, ok. it was not much of a problem but just a suggestion i wanted, since obviously the history will not be very clean :)
67 2013-07-17T16:34:23 *** ebo^
68 2013-07-17T16:41:52 <sharky93> TheSheep: did you try cloning and running an instance of the bootstrap fork ?
69 2013-07-17T16:47:50 <TheSheep> sharky93: yes, but not today
70 2013-07-17T16:48:48 *** rciorba
71 2013-07-17T16:50:11 <sharky93> TheSheep: hmm, i was wondering what should we go for next
72 2013-07-17T17:42:35 <asingla> ThomasWaldmann: updated https://codereview.appspot.com/10915044/
73 2013-07-17T17:43:08 *** rciorba
74 2013-07-17T17:47:15 *** greg_
75 2013-07-17T17:52:46 <asingla> ThomasWaldmann: also updated class name https://codereview.appspot.com/10869045
76 2013-07-17T18:16:12 <sharky93> TheSheep: indents and fixing pep8 etc is one, but after that
77 2013-07-17T18:16:15 <sharky93> ?
78 2013-07-17T18:16:23 <sharky93> TheSheep: is it early to move onto specific views ?
79 2013-07-17T21:13:11 *** dave_largo
80 2013-07-17T21:31:36 *** ebo^
81 2013-07-17T21:42:13 *** rciorba
82 2013-07-17T22:00:11 *** brunomartin
83 2013-07-17T22:20:49 *** bilal
84 2013-07-17T22:33:48 *** brunomartin
85 2013-07-17T22:42:35 *** brunomartin
86 2013-07-17T22:47:31 *** bilal
87 2013-07-17T23:19:12 * asingla works on how to handle the root url in different scenarios.
88