1 2010-03-17T00:53:29 *** grzywacz
2 2010-03-17T07:39:45 *** TheSheep
3 2010-03-17T09:28:58 <dreimark> moin
4 2010-03-17T15:33:19 *** valeuf
5 2010-03-17T15:40:03 *** valeuf
6 2010-03-17T18:50:10 *** grzywacz
7 2010-03-17T20:52:23 <dreimark> re
8 2010-03-17T22:30:11 <ThomasWaldmann> re2
9 2010-03-17T23:17:23 <dreimark> ThomasWaldmann: i want to add DictColumns, the tests do cover 91%
10 2010-03-17T23:17:26 <dreimark> http://paste.pocoo.org/show/190958/
11 2010-03-17T23:22:10 <ThomasWaldmann> MacroMarket or extensions repo
12 2010-03-17T23:23:25 <dreimark> 1.9
13 2010-03-17T23:24:16 <dreimark> we discussed this already i just rewrote CollectLists
14 2010-03-17T23:24:25 <dreimark> to get it nicer and tests done
15 2010-03-17T23:26:35 <ThomasWaldmann> + assert len(result) == len(expected_result)
16 2010-03-17T23:27:00 <ThomasWaldmann> that's exactly the same kind of test as in our search tests
17 2010-03-17T23:27:33 <dreimark> this is only to check dubs removed by set in the next line
18 2010-03-17T23:28:23 <dreimark> i like the set check more, but it has this limitation
19 2010-03-17T23:30:07 <ThomasWaldmann> if you want to check whether something is in the result, you have to check THAT
20 2010-03-17T23:30:27 <ThomasWaldmann> not do list size and set comparisons
21 2010-03-17T23:30:56 <ThomasWaldmann> if such a test fails, you just know "oh, it's 3, but it should be 5"
22 2010-03-17T23:31:32 <ThomasWaldmann> we already have that pain in the search tests, we don't need more of that
23 2010-03-17T23:32:50 <ThomasWaldmann> also, everything that gets added to 1.9 needs to get ported to moin2
24 2010-03-17T23:33:48 <dreimark> i know this too and because allmost all of our tables are based on that
25 2010-03-17T23:33:51 <ThomasWaldmann> so, we just stop adding
26 2010-03-17T23:33:58 <dreimark> no
27 2010-03-17T23:34:13 <ThomasWaldmann> you can use it as a plugin, what's the problem?
28 2010-03-17T23:34:32 <dreimark> why not make it used on moinmo.in too
29 2010-03-17T23:34:48 <dreimark> or some other wikis builtin
30 2010-03-17T23:36:25 <dreimark> we added also a lot of stuff after 1.9.0 why not adding a macro
31 2010-03-17T23:36:43 <ThomasWaldmann> let's reverse the question, why should we?
32 2010-03-17T23:37:09 <dreimark> it makes tables much easier to handle than everything else.
33 2010-03-17T23:37:45 <dreimark> and it just can collect status informations
34 2010-03-17T23:38:29 <dreimark> i would prefer some table of our work on bugpages without
35 2010-03-17T23:38:36 <ThomasWaldmann> and if you looks at docs/CHANGES, the "new features" are usually just very small things or modifications of existing code, nothing really new
36 2010-03-17T23:38:38 <dreimark> searching on all
37 2010-03-17T23:39:32 <dreimark> I don't need api changes for this macro
38 2010-03-17T23:40:58 <dreimark> I also would need something very similar in 2.0 because i don't think we will have there a better way
39 2010-03-17T23:41:01 <dreimark> to do this
40 2010-03-17T23:47:20 <dreimark> also it uses lots of features of the browser widget
41 2010-03-17T23:48:09 <ThomasWaldmann> sorry, but that code confuses me. put it on MacroMarket or into extension repo.
42 2010-03-17T23:58:19 <dreimark> shit
43 2010-03-17T23:58:30 <dreimark> http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinWiki
44 2010-03-17T23:58:37 <dreimark> please remove the attachment
MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2010-03-17 (last edited 2010-03-17 00:00:03 by IrcLogImporter)