2009-10-01T00:15:37 <dreimark> ThomasWaldmann: can you look at the irc collector script (logs are missing)
2009-10-01T00:17:49 <dreimark> for some reason (or the reason is me) the calendar macro seems not to work at http://moinmo.in/MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev
2009-10-01T00:18:21 <dreimark> I can't go back
2009-10-01T00:18:41 <ThomasWaldmann> re
2009-10-01T00:44:27 *** grzywacz has quit IRC
2009-10-01T01:08:37 *** tpfennig has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T02:40:05 *** tpfennig has quit IRC
2009-10-01T03:57:17 *** amartani has quit IRC
2009-10-01T08:40:21 <ThomasWaldmann> moin
2009-10-01T08:50:07 <dreimark> moin
2009-10-01T09:01:40 *** tpfennig has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T09:31:19 *** moinBot has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T09:33:04 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: irclog is broken because cli request object has not attribute cfg
2009-10-01T09:47:22 <ThomasWaldmann> hm, maybe just a wrong --wiki-url, we'll see soon
2009-10-01T10:26:14 *** JosefMeier has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T10:26:27 <JosefMeier> Moin Moin
2009-10-01T10:27:08 <JosefMeier> dreimark: I saw your comment on the missing cfg field in the request object. Thats why I had to provide two versions of the freemind macro!
2009-10-01T10:27:22 <JosefMeier> All macros for Moin < 1.9 have to be adjusted cause of that
2009-10-01T10:27:44 <JosefMeier> Is it possible to add this cfg field to the request object?
2009-10-01T10:27:57 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann:
2009-10-01T12:06:56 <ThomasWaldmann> in my recent case, it was just a wrong --wiki-url
2009-10-01T12:13:41 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: dreimark: Is it wanted, that the request object lacks of the cfg variable?
2009-10-01T12:14:26 <ThomasWaldmann> i don't think so
2009-10-01T12:21:33 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: Does it have to get fixed for the final release?
2009-10-01T12:28:37 <ThomasWaldmann> do we have a bug for it?
2009-10-01T12:28:47 <ThomasWaldmann> (on the wiki?)
2009-10-01T12:29:08 * ThomasWaldmann didn't see that bug in practice yet
2009-10-01T12:34:29 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: Some macros and actions won't work
2009-10-01T12:35:02 <ThomasWaldmann> i need a bug report on the wiki, including tracebacks, references to stuff that doesn't work, etc.
2009-10-01T12:35:35 <ThomasWaldmann> (and best is if you can reproduce it easily, with builtin stuff)
2009-10-01T12:36:29 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: action.getHandler has a different behaviour between 1.8 and 1.9
2009-10-01T12:37:31 <ThomasWaldmann> dimazest: btw, we could still need some xapian fixes. i'ld like to fix some bugs this weekend and/or release a beta5
2009-10-01T12:38:53 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: Is the missing cfg a bug? At least some 3rd party macros dont work which worked for 1.8
2009-10-01T12:39:39 <ThomasWaldmann> maybe. i have to look at it first. :)
2009-10-01T12:39:54 <ThomasWaldmann> i need a bug report on the wiki, see above.
2009-10-01T12:42:50 <JosefMeier> So I will write a bug report alto
2009-10-01T12:43:01 <JosefMeier> although its not clear if it is a bug :-) ?
2009-10-01T12:44:08 <JosefMeier> Reimars bug report about the Month calendar seems to go in the same direction. He reports a missing cfg variable also
2009-10-01T12:44:32 <ThomasWaldmann> JosefMeier: if it is not a bug: we have a category for that or one can just delete the page
2009-10-01T12:45:05 <ThomasWaldmann> about the getHandler: 1.8 wants request, 1.9 wants request.cfg as 1st argument
2009-10-01T12:45:55 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: Why?
2009-10-01T12:45:57 <ThomasWaldmann> if you file another bug for that, we can revert that change easily. moin has only 2 callers for that function.
2009-10-01T12:46:04 <JosefMeier> 3
2009-10-01T12:46:10 <JosefMeier> 4 :-)
2009-10-01T12:46:18 <JosefMeier> Think about 3rd party macros also
2009-10-01T12:46:51 <ThomasWaldmann> so if you can give more than 2 3rd party callers that we'll break, we have a good reason to stay compatible
2009-10-01T12:47:17 <ThomasWaldmann> -> bug report
2009-10-01T12:48:40 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: If I'm allowed to summarize our conversation: You want me to write a bug report?
2009-10-01T12:48:58 <ThomasWaldmann> yes
2009-10-01T12:49:01 <JosefMeier> :-D
2009-10-01T12:50:02 <ThomasWaldmann> it is just easier to process than stuff splattered on irc logs of some hours/days
2009-10-01T12:56:47 <JosefMeier> bug report: done
2009-10-01T13:11:33 <ThomasWaldmann> JosefMeier: i renamed the page
2009-10-01T13:12:51 * dreimark is not sure if that should be workarounded because if an action uses forms it needs to get changes anyway
2009-10-01T13:13:24 <dreimark> may be we could backport the wikiutil version class to 1.8
2009-10-01T13:13:37 <dreimark> and show an example how to use it
2009-10-01T13:14:22 <JosefMeier> dreimark: you want the interface of getHandler to be changed?
2009-10-01T13:14:36 <JosefMeier> back to 1.8 or leave it as is in 1.9 ?
2009-10-01T13:15:03 <ThomasWaldmann> dreimark: the forms stuff is for a good reason, the getHandler stuff is for a reason too, but a rather minor one
2009-10-01T13:15:19 <dreimark> see http://hg.moinmo.in/moin/extensions/file/89b8539eebd9/data/plugin/action/arnica_slides.py#l350
2009-10-01T13:15:42 <dreimark> that needs to refactored for wikiutil.version stuff now with 1.9 again
2009-10-01T13:17:07 <dreimark> JosefMeier: I mean the problem is that if it makes sense to change getHandler while the user also has to change the other part
2009-10-01T13:17:26 <dreimark> I am not sure currently.
2009-10-01T13:18:13 <JosefMeier> dreimark: I don't think there are a lot of extensions for 1.9 yet. But if this change of the interface will stay in 1.9 a few macros could need changes.
2009-10-01T13:18:15 <dreimark> and I have no idea now if there are actions that won't need this change because of form change
2009-10-01T13:18:22 <ThomasWaldmann> i think we'll change getHandler to be 1.8 compatible, but we won't change form/args/values because the new approach is cleaner and mandated by werkzeug
2009-10-01T13:19:15 <dreimark> look at our builtin stuff first
2009-10-01T13:19:19 <ThomasWaldmann> and while looking at ensureversion, I think we need that Version class from 2.0 wikiutil :)
2009-10-01T13:19:20 <dreimark> htg, bbl
2009-10-01T13:19:40 <dreimark> ThomasWaldmann: isn't it in 1.9 now?
2009-10-01T13:19:45 <dreimark> we need it !
2009-10-01T13:20:06 <ThomasWaldmann> not sure, have to look
2009-10-01T13:20:11 <dreimark> bbl
2009-10-01T13:20:51 <JosefMeier> ThomasWaldmann: did you check how much modules access the "new" getHandler interface?
2009-10-01T13:20:56 <JosefMeier> in 1.9
2009-10-01T13:27:12 <ThomasWaldmann> 2?
2009-10-01T13:32:07 <JosefMeier> sounds not too much. So you will make it 1.8 compatible again?
2009-10-01T13:34:29 <ThomasWaldmann> i think so
2009-10-01T13:34:33 <ThomasWaldmann> gtg/bbl
2009-10-01T15:26:09 *** TheSheep has quit IRC
2009-10-01T15:26:09 *** vpv has quit IRC
2009-10-01T15:26:09 *** ser has quit IRC
2009-10-01T15:26:09 *** ThomasWaldmann has quit IRC
2009-10-01T15:26:40 *** ThomasWaldmann has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T15:26:40 *** vpv has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T15:26:40 *** ser has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T15:26:40 *** TheSheep has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T15:49:47 *** JosefMeier has quit IRC
2009-10-01T17:23:33 *** grzywacz has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T18:26:33 *** TheSheep has quit IRC
2009-10-01T18:26:33 *** vpv has quit IRC
2009-10-01T18:26:33 *** ser has quit IRC
2009-10-01T18:28:55 *** TheSheep has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T18:29:26 *** vpv has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T18:45:55 *** ser has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T18:56:28 <dimazest> moin
2009-10-01T18:57:19 <dimazest> ThomasWaldmann: i'll have time on Saturday, also tomorow
2009-10-01T18:58:07 *** JosefMeier has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T19:25:43 <JosefMeier> bbl
2009-10-01T20:21:32 <dreimark> dimazest: perfect :)
2009-10-01T20:24:34 <dreimark> was macht eigentlich Dein Deutschkurs?
2009-10-01T20:35:28 *** tpfennig has quit IRC
2009-10-01T22:00:53 *** tpfennig has joined #moin-dev
2009-10-01T22:11:41 *** xorAxAx has quit IRC
2009-10-01T23:28:30 *** JosefMeier has quit IRC
MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2009-10-01 (last edited 2009-10-01 08:00:15 by IrcLogImporter)