MoinMoin: MoinMoinChat/Logs/moin-dev/2007-03-25

2007-03-25T17:10:24  <dreimark> I do like to see the storage engine refactored but only if he get finished that. Is his MoinMoin experience known?
2007-03-25T17:11:30  <dreimark> sorry I have to go to the train station, will be back somewhere in the evening
2007-03-25T17:47:45  * ThomasWaldmann looks at Heinrich's code
2007-03-25T18:56:46  <ThomasWaldmann> moin lanius
2007-03-25T19:20:49  <ThomasWaldmann> lanius: query?
2007-03-25T19:44:14  <lanius> ThomasWaldmann: yeah, sorry
2007-03-25T22:39:39  <rhoe> good evening altogether!
2007-03-25T22:40:23  <rhoe> changeset 1892 - dc1c3ca94cf8 : css_class does not validate for html 4.01 strict
2007-03-25T23:15:43  <ThomasWaldmann> moin rhoe
2007-03-25T23:17:00  <ThomasWaldmann> rhoe: which branch?
2007-03-25T23:24:31  <rhoe> ah! moin thomas!
2007-03-25T23:24:40  <rhoe> it's the 1.6 branch..
2007-03-25T23:24:55  <rhoe> came up with this since i tested simplemente if it is valid..
2007-03-25T23:25:18  <rhoe> did some mistake for the page_footer1... div missing...
2007-03-25T23:25:33  <rhoe> css_class caused also trouble..
2007-03-25T23:31:32  <rhoe> just also wanted to do some extended MonthCalender macro which shows the page e.g. 25_3_07 in an <iframe>...
2007-03-25T23:31:40  <rhoe> this works fine..
2007-03-25T23:31:51  <rhoe> you can also edit the page in this frame..
2007-03-25T23:32:03  <rhoe> however iframes are not allowed in strict...
2007-03-25T23:32:09  <rhoe> shit!
2007-03-25T23:33:28  <rhoe> wanted to use that for taskplanner so if you click in the calender on a date the page is displayed in the <iframe> under the monthcalender..
2007-03-25T23:33:48  <rhoe> there is no need to go back an forth on the pages anymore..
2007-03-25T23:34:12  <ThomasWaldmann> one after the other. where is that changeset? url?
2007-03-25T23:35:20  <rhoe> ok..ok..
2007-03-25T23:35:29  <ThomasWaldmann> ok, found it
2007-03-25T23:35:43  <ThomasWaldmann> i thought what you give is the commit comment
2007-03-25T23:36:12  <rhoe> http://hg.thinkmo.de/moin/1.6?cl=1901
2007-03-25T23:36:43  <rhoe> don't use ID for navi_bar links as there are 2 navibars on a page for modern theme
2007-03-25T23:36:59  <ThomasWaldmann> so what is the problem with css_class?
2007-03-25T23:39:17  <rhoe> the w3c validator complains about an unknown attrib..
2007-03-25T23:39:31  <ThomasWaldmann> url?
2007-03-25T23:39:59  <rhoe> http://validator.w3.org/
2007-03-25T23:40:08  <rhoe> i have uploaded a saved file there
2007-03-25T23:40:20  <rhoe> and then checked it..
2007-03-25T23:40:20  <ThomasWaldmann> reproduce it on the test wiki and give me the complete url
2007-03-25T23:41:18  <ThomasWaldmann> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ftest.wikiwikiweb.de%2F
2007-03-25T23:43:03  <rhoe> sorry thomas...
2007-03-25T23:43:10  <rhoe> if think i did a mistake..
2007-03-25T23:43:18  <rhoe> it does validate..
2007-03-25T23:43:43  <rhoe> sorry..
2007-03-25T23:44:13  <rhoe> css_class is the calling para of the python function..
2007-03-25T23:44:27  <rhoe> i have put that manually in the html file...
2007-03-25T23:44:36  <rhoe> slap my forehead..
2007-03-25T23:44:43  <rhoe> that's of course a no brainer...
2007-03-25T23:45:54  <ThomasWaldmann> :) we use css_class because class is is a python keyword
2007-03-25T23:46:01  <rhoe> right...
2007-03-25T23:46:05  <rhoe> shame on me..
2007-03-25T23:46:33  <rhoe> looked at the diff and did not think about that..
2007-03-25T23:47:12  <ThomasWaldmann> the lower layer has some magic to map css_class -> "class"
2007-03-25T23:47:31  <rhoe> ok.. however there is no way now to easly link with page internal links to that menu item..
2007-03-25T23:47:41  <rhoe> you could do that with ids, or?
2007-03-25T23:48:00  <rhoe> it's just for AccessibleMoin
2007-03-25T23:48:17  <rhoe> there such things could be needed, e.g. for skip links and accesskeys
2007-03-25T23:48:20  <ThomasWaldmann> well, we can't use ids if we have multiple of them
2007-03-25T23:48:36  <rhoe> right, that's the reason why you replaced it..
2007-03-25T23:48:47  <rhoe> but how about the name keyword
2007-03-25T23:48:50  <rhoe> ?
2007-03-25T23:49:00  <rhoe> i used that massively in simplemente..
2007-03-25T23:49:15  <rhoe> had to overwrite the stuff from theme.init
2007-03-25T23:49:27  <rhoe> to provide somekind of anchor target..
2007-03-25T23:50:03  <rhoe> and name can occur more than 1 time in a page..
2007-03-25T23:50:18  <rhoe> so that would be also ok..
2007-03-25T23:50:44  <rhoe> does validate..
2007-03-25T23:50:52  <rhoe> name="nbinfo"
2007-03-25T23:50:58  <ThomasWaldmann> can i access name from css?
2007-03-25T23:51:28  <rhoe> no, i don't think so, i am not sure...
2007-03-25T23:51:42  <rhoe> the be on the safe side we would have to use both class and name..
2007-03-25T23:51:51  <rhoe> instead of just id..
2007-03-25T23:52:28  <rhoe> so there would be css access and javascript and anchors access in a valid html 4.01 strivt way
2007-03-25T23:54:20  <ThomasWaldmann> maybe put that on some accessibility feature request page, i guess if we do that, we have to do that at many places
2007-03-25T23:54:39  <rhoe> ok. i will keep that in mind..